dinsdag 25 oktober 2011

Een stap vooruit in de behandeling van MS

Antibody offers hope for multiple sclerosis treatment

Promising phase III trial paves the way for alemtuzumab approval.

The first drug to show signs of not just halting multiple sclerosis (MS), but actually reversing the nerve damage caused by the condition, has taken a significant step towards clinical approval.
The results of a phase III trial, presented on 22 October at the 5th Joint Triennial Congress of the European and Americas Committees for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, in Amsterdam, found that 78% of patients treated with the monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab remained free from relapse after two years — and half the relapse rate of one of the standard therapies, interferon β-1a (marketed as Rebif, among other names).

However, alemtuzumab did not perform quite as well as it had in earlier trials. There was some evidence that it had reversed damage to nerves, but the result was not statistically significant, says Alasdair Coles, a neuroscientist at the University of Cambridge, UK, and the UK chief investigator of the Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis (CARE-MS) I trial.
Coles told the meeting that magnetic resonance imaging showed that subjects taking alemtuzumab had also lost less brain volume than those taking Rebif, a proxy measure for overall tissue damage. "Alemtuzumab has eliminated the loss of brain tissue," he says.
Just 8% of patients taking alemtuzumab experienced a worsening in disability according to standard measures, in comparison with 11% taking Rebif. There was no statistical difference between the two groups, but Coles puts this down to Rebif performing better than expected. "The patients recruited in this trial showed very little worsening of disability," he says.

Significant promise?

Ludwig Kappos, chair of neurology at the University Hospital of Basel in Switzerland, who has been involved in several MS drug trials, says he is disappointed that there was no significant effect on disability progression. "This is in contrast to what the phase II study has shown," he says. But he expects this effect to show up in another ongoing phase III trial: CARE-MS II, the preliminary results of which should be available later this year.
There is no cure for MS, a condition caused by the body's own immune system attacking the myelin sheath that normally protects the nerves and speeds up neurological signals in the brain and spinal cord. At the moment, the only treatments are drugs such as interferon β-1a and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone), both of which merely slow the progression of the disease.
But alemtuzumab has the potential to reverse it: the drug tackles the mechanisms that cause damage to cells by effectively resetting the immune system. It targets the CD52 glycoproteins on the surface of mature immune cells, or lymphocytes, depleting levels of the aggressive T and B cells without affecting other lymphocytes. For reasons still not quite understood, when the lymphocytes repopulate, those involved in attacking the myelin sheath seem less likely to recover..

Immune response

Although the efficacy of alemtuzumab is impressive, performance was never really the issue, says Les Funtleyder, a health-care strategist at trading firm Miller Tabak + Co in New York. "With alemtuzumab the issue is safety," he says.
The drug brings an increased risk of autoimmune diseases. In the trial, 18.1% of people taking alemtuzumab experienced thyroid-related autoimmune responses, and 0.8% developed the potentially life-threatening condition immune thrombocytopenia. But, says Coles, these findings mirror those from earlier trials, and it is possible to identify those patients most at risk by screening for certain biomarkers. "What's reassuring with this trial is that there are no new safety issues," he says.
Some patients and clinicians who have already got wind of the alemtuzumab's efficacy seem unwilling to wait for clinical approval, says Coles. The drug is already approved in many countries as a treatment for some forms of leukaemia and lymphoma, under the name Campath. In some countries, including the United Kingdom, it is legal to prescribe any drug for off-label use, and so patients have already started using it to treat MS, he says.
But it is not just MS patients who have been holding their breath over this drug, says Funtleyder. Earlier this year, Genzyme, a drug company based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, that makes alemtuzumab and a range of other therapies, was acquired by Paris-based drug-maker Sanofi. The value of the deal for Genzyme's shareholders is contingent on the success of alemtuzumab in treating MS; the first milestone is for the drug to gain approval from the US Food and Drug Administration before the end of March 2014.

http://www.nature.com/news/2011/111024/full/news.2011.609.html

maandag 24 oktober 2011

Eenn stap vooruit in de behandeling van Long Kanker

Lung cancer vaccine shows promise


Lung cancer 

A vaccine which triggers the immune system to attack the most common type of lung cancer has shown promise in early clinical trials, say researchers.

Tests on 148 patients, reported in the Lancet Oncology, showed that adding the vaccine to chemotherapy slowed the cancer's progression.

However, its effect on overall survival was limited and further trials are now needed.

Cancer Research UK said there were many unanswered questions.

Vaccines for cancer use the same principles as vaccines against infection - training the body's own immune system. However, instead of protecting against measles or seasonal flu, these vaccines attack tumours growing in the body.

The idea is that when a cell becomes cancerous and divides uncontrollably, its starts to look different. Proteins on the surface of the cells change and the immune system can be trained to spot these changes.

Targeted:
Researchers at the University of Strasbourg used a vaccine called TG4010. It is a modified pox virus, distantly related to smallpox, which has been genetically modified to make a "cancerous" surface protein.

Patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer took part in the trial. All were given standard chemotherapy treatment, half were also infected with the virus.

Six months later, the illness was more likely to be stable in vaccinated patients than in those just taking chemotherapy drugs. Six month "progression free survival" was 43% for vaccinated patients and 35% for those on chemotherapy.

However average survival was 10.7 months in vaccinated patients, only marginally higher than the 10.3 months in chemotherapy patients.

Prof Peter Johnson, chief clinician at Cancer Research UK, said: "There's a lot of interest in harnessing the power of the immune system to treat cancer. This early-stage study shows that combining a vaccine with chemotherapy is possible, and may have some benefits for some people with lung cancer.

"But this study leaves a lot of unanswered questions - further research is needed to see whether the vaccine will actually improve survival for lung cancer patients."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-15401739

vrijdag 2 september 2011

New Cancer Treatment

'New anti-cancer virus' shows potentials in Anti-Cancer Treatment


An engineered virus, injected into the blood, can selectively target cancer cells throughout the body in what researchers have labeled a medical first.
The virus attacked only tumors, leaving the healthy tissue alone, in a small trial on 23 patients, according to the journal Nature.Researchers said the findings could one day "truly transform" therapies.Cancer specialists said using viruses showed "real promise".

Using viruses to attack cancers is not a new concept, but they have needed to be injected directly into tumors in order to evade the immune system.

Smallpox to cancer
Scientists modified the vaccinia virus, which is more famous for being used to develop a smallpox vaccine.
The virus, named JX-594, is dependent upon a chemical pathway, common in some cancers, in order to replicate.It was injected at different doses into the blood of 23 patients with cancers which had spread to multiple organs in the body.In the eight patients receiving the highest dose, seven had the virus replicating in their tumors, but not in healthy tissue.Prof John Bell, lead researcher and from the University of Ottawa, said: "We are very excited because this is the first time in medical history that a viral therapy has been shown to consistently and selectively replicate in cancer tissue after intravenous infusion in humans."Intravenous delivery is crucial for cancer treatment because it allows us to target tumors throughout the body as opposed to just those that we can directly inject." Infection prevented further tumor growth in six patients for a time. However, the virus did not cure cancer. Patients were given only one dose of the virus as the trial was designed to test the safety of the virus.It is thought that the virus could be used to deliver treatments directly to cancerous cells in high concentrations. Prof Bell acknowledges that the research is still in the very early stages, but he said: "I believe that someday, viruses and other biological therapies could truly transform our approach for treating cancer."
Cancer Research UK's Prof Nick Lemoine, also director of Barts Cancer Institute, said: "Viruses that multiply in just tumor cells - avoiding healthy cells - are showing real promise as a new biological approach to target hard-to-treat cancers.
"This new study is important because it shows that a virus previously used safely to vaccinate against smallpox in millions of people can now be modified to reach cancers through the bloodstream - even after cancer has spread widely through the patient's body.
"It is particularly encouraging that responses were seen even in tumors like mesothelioma, a cancer which can be particularly hard to treat."


A Major step forward in the treatment of Cancer

Dr. Harry Spoelstra MD.